In the wake of that removal, several other sunscreens, thought to be based on a similar formula, were quietly removed from sale.
Now the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is taking action.
On Tuesday, 30 September, the TGA is now suggesting consumers find alternatives to the 21 sunscreen products identified as sharing the same base formulation as Ultra Violette’s Lean Screen.
“Preliminary testing of specific goods manufactured using the base formulation indicates that the SPF value of the goods may, for at least some of the goods, be as low as SPF 4.”
If you purchased a product in the above list, the TGA states that “you may wish to consider using an alternative product until the TGA completes its review”.
CHOICE had initially tested Ultra Violette’s Lean Screen at an SPF of 4, against a claim of SPF 50+. A secondary test conducted at an alternative independent lab in Germany came back with a result of SPF 5. In response Ultra Violette did its own internal testing and ultimately removed the product from shelves.
If you purchased a product in the above list, the TGA states that ‘you may wish to consider using an alternative product’ until it completes its review
“We had multiple, independent labs conduct new tests of Lean Screen,” Ultra Violette said in a statement released in August.
To date, tests on Ultra Violette’s Lean Screen returned SPFs of 4, 10, 21, 26, 33, 60, 61 and 64.
“That wasn’t good enough for us, and it isn’t good enough for you,” Ultra Violette said in August.
“Given this pattern of inconsistency in testing, we have decided to withdraw Lean/Velvet Screen from the market, effective immediately. Purchases of this product will be eligible for a refund and a product voucher, regardless of where it was purchased.”
Concerns over reliability of sunscreen lab
The TGA also called out Princeton Consumer Research Corp (PCR), the UK-based lab responsible for Ultra Violette’s initial testing. That lab was also used by eight products that did not meet their SPF claims in CHOICE testing.
“[T]he TGA has significant concerns about the reliability of SPF testing undertaken by Princeton Consumer Research Corp (PCR Corp), a testing laboratory based in the United Kingdom,” the TGA wrote in a statement.
“The TGA is aware that many companies responsible for sunscreens manufactured using this base formulation relied on testing by PCR Corp to support their SPF claims, and that they obtained that testing before they were informed of the TGA’s concerns.
[T]he TGA has significant concerns about the reliability of SPF testing undertaken by Princeton Consumer Research Corp (PCR Corp), a testing laboratory based in the United Kingdom
TGA statement
“The TGA has now outlined its concerns with PCR Corp testing to all companies responsible for sunscreens manufactured using this base formulation. The TGA has also written to PCR Corp regarding its concerns and has not received a response.”
The TGA has notified all sunscreen manufacturers named above about the concerns with both the base formula and the testing performed by PCR.
“It’s highly concerning to see the TGA confirm that 20 sunscreens using the same base formula as Ultra Violette’s Lean Screen are unlikely to meet their SPF claims,” says CHOICE CEO Ashley De Silva.
“Today’s announcement highlights, yet again, the importance of the TGA’s investigation and the need for changes to how sunscreens are regulated and tested in Australia.”
Mark Serrels is the Editorial director at CHOICE. Mark oversees content on a wide variety of topics and enjoys making complex subjects easy to understand.
Prior to CHOICE, Mark worked in technology and games journalism. He edited magazines and worked on sites such as Kotaku, Gizmodo and CNET.
Mark enjoys communicating the CHOICE mission to the broadest audience possible. He wants all Australians to be informed, entertained and above all, empowered as consumers.
Mark has a Master of Arts from the University of Stirling, Scotland.
Find Mark on Twitter or LinkedIn.
Mark Serrels is the Editorial director at CHOICE. Mark oversees content on a wide variety of topics and enjoys making complex subjects easy to understand.
Prior to CHOICE, Mark worked in technology and games journalism. He edited magazines and worked on sites such as Kotaku, Gizmodo and CNET.
Mark enjoys communicating the CHOICE mission to the broadest audience possible. He wants all Australians to be informed, entertained and above all, empowered as consumers.
Mark has a Master of Arts from the University of Stirling, Scotland.
Find Mark on Twitter or LinkedIn.
For more than 60 years, we've been making a difference for Australian consumers. In that time, we've never taken ads or sponsorship.
Instead we're funded by members who value expert reviews and independent product testing.
With no self-interest behind our advice, you don't just buy smarter, you get the answers that you need.
You know without hesitation what's safe for you and your family. And our recent sunscreens test showed just how important it is to keep business claims in check.
So you'll never be alone when something goes wrong or a business treats you unfairly.
